Friday, December 13, 2013

A Stronger and More Hopeful Condition

In his autobiography titled “Up From Slavery”, the great educator and orator, and former slave, Booker T. Washington states that “… when we rid ourselves of prejudice, or racial feeling, and look facts in the face, we must acknowledge that, notwithstanding the cruelty and moral wrong of slavery, the ten million Negroes inhabiting this country, who themselves or whose ancestors went through the school of American slavery, are in a stronger and more hopeful condition, materially, intellectually, morally, and religiously, than is true of an equal number of black people in any other portion of the globe.”  If a former slave writing in 1900, only four years after Plessy v Ferguson, in the same publication that he writes of an epidemic of lynchings, can make this statement, then surely the vast majority of 21st century descendents of those “ten million Negroes” living in America must admit that they too are in a “stronger and more hopeful condition” than any equal number of dark skinned people anywhere else in the world; a “stronger and more hopeful condition” than if their ancestors had not been brutally stolen from their lives in Africa and forced into slavery in the Americas.  Of course Mr. Washington is not trying to justify slavery and neither am I; nor is there justification for Jim Crow, ‘separate but equal”, segregation, or any of the injustices blacks have suffered as a result of skin color in the United States.  I could make the point that almost all such injustices are behind us; that 21st century blacks are no more likely than anyone else to suffer unfair treatment in America, but that is not my primary point; my point is that as a group, blacks in America today are better off than they would be if they had all been born in Africa.  Blacks no longer have a reason to be angry at America or with white Americans in general.

Most non-black Americans have no ancestral connection to slavery. My own case, while not very interesting, is fairly typical.  My ancestors on one side were dirt poor Finnish immigrants that arrived here via Ellis Island long after the end of American slavery, and those on the other side were dirt poor English northern “wage slaves”.  None ever owned or cared to own another human, and one died fighting in the war to end slavery.  I deserve no credit for his sacrifice, but also deserve no guilt or responsibility for the actions of those he was fighting.  But even if ones great-great-grandfather had been Simon Legree himself, that shines no ill light on the descendent. It is wrong to punish the son for crimes of the father, let alone long dead, unknown ancestors.  Besides, if we are to point our fingers at ancestors, then America’s blacks might as well point at their own white ancestors that owned slaves and fathered slaves, not those of most white Americans who did neither.  We are each responsible for the meanness or racism we harbor in our breasts today, but not for that of others.

Racism is not just judging people by race – that practice is better described as “prejudice” as in pre-judging people based on conditions they do not control.  Racism is a bigger, broader term meaning placing an unreasonable emphasis on race rather than on individuals.  Anyone who judges a black person by the color of his skin is both prejudice and racist, but no more so than one who condemns the white race for the actions of the long dead portion of it that practiced or supported the practice of slavery in 18th and 19th century America. 

Likewise, without trying to justify the “Trail of Tears” or “Wounded Knee”, American Indians (note 1) are better off today than if Europeans had never bumped into these continents.  This may not seem obvious to some, but any American Indian that cannot see without his eye-glasses or has been relieved by modern medicine of appendicitis or an impacted molar should find it easy to agree. And any over the age of 45 or 50 should simply be grateful for being alive because research shows that pre-Columbian life spans among natives of the Americas were typically 35 to 45 years, and on the decline long before 1492 according to Dr. Richard H. Steckel and Dr. Jerome C. Rose in the book that they edited titled “The Backbone of History: Health and Nutrition in the Western Hemisphere(note 2).  Indians in general live longer, healthier, more comfortable lives today than before 1492, and there is no reason to believe that their living conditions would have improved measurably between then and now without the introduction of European technology.  While European peasants were perhaps worse off than most American Indians in 1492, Europe was poised for advances that would raise the standard of living for all of its citizens.  Those living in the Americas were in no such position; civilizations that have not invented the wheel or printing press do not experience sudden surges in technological advancement. 

Notwithstanding the hell their antecedents went through to get here or the millions who will never be born because would-have-been ancestors were wiped out prematurely by disease or bullets, at this moment in time, and I daresay looking forward, our American Indian fellow citizens are better off because Europeans came along.

Am I better off because my ancestors on one side left England to come to America a couple of hundred years ago and those on the other side Finland a hundred years later?  I’ve been to England and found it a very pleasant country, and I believe Finland is also, but I would not trade the life I’ve had in the United States for citizenship anywhere else in the world.  I believe myself, and others of European descent, are better off being here than in the “old country”, no matter the hardships so many went through to make it happen. 

One needs only to chat with a few of America’s recent immigrants to learn that they, almost unanimously, are thrilled to be here. I can state examples of people from all over Eastern Europe and Asia as well as Latin America and Mexico of people that embrace their new American citizenship with happiness and pride. In general, no matter how it came to be, race notwithstanding, Americans are lucky to be citizens of the United States of America. 

Booker T. Washington’s message to the young, black men and women that came to his Tuskegee Institute for education and training was consistent for the decades he was in charge there – learn skills that make you valuable to a community, and you will be welcome in any town, north or south.  His goal was to raise up black youth to be solid, valuable citizens and in doing so to help raise up the entire race, the entire south, and the entire nation.  He taught them to scorn the label of victim and embrace their citizenship.  We might argue that Washington was overly optimistic in his day; that no matter their skills blacks would have been shunned in far too many communities in America; but even if his message was overly optimistic in 1900, it is certainly true today, and the value of his message to scorn victimhood and becoming valuable citizens is universal.

Washington taught victims to shun the role of victim and become solid citizens; today our leaders create victims where they do not exist for political gain. In this modern era, the last decades of the twentieth century and the first decades of the twenty-first, there are fewer real victims in the United States than at any time in history, and perhaps more people than ever that perceive of themselves as victims.  Victimhood is practically a status symbol in modern America.  We are in desperate need of leadership that remembers and echoes the wisdom of Booker T. Washington.  We are in desperate need of the optimism and patriotism in our citizenry that Washington worked to instill in his students and others.  Only then can we all work together toward “a stronger and more hopeful condition” for all Americans.  


Note 1: Like many writers I’m a bit at a loss for a satisfactory term for what are today commonly called “Native Americans”.  That term in my opinion insults all who were born in America that are not of the indigenous race and also insults the “Natives” because “America” would not be the name of their homeland if not for Europeans.  I settle on the term “American Indian”, however inappropriate, because my Shoshone friends refer to themselves as “Indians”, but I feel like I have to differentiate between them and my friends from India. 
Related Links:

4 comments:

  1. Since I just happen to be at my computer working on a family history project for my children for Christmas, I availed myself of the chance to read your article immediately upon notification of it's completion. You have a way of making points that many of us wish we had Dan. I wholeheartedly agree with what you have said. Thanks for sharing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Cindy... Sometimes I feel like I'm writing to a vacuum. Feedback is very much appreciated. Thanks for taking the time to read it.

      Delete
  2. Well said. The U. S. Constitution is meant to protect the only true minority - the INDIVIDUAL.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you - and thank you for taking the time to read my ramblings...

      Delete